Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Srivenkataramana, T.
- Non-Performing Assets of Indian Commercial Banks:A Critical Evaluation
Abstract Views :154 |
PDF Views:74
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of MBA, Brindavan College, Yelahanka, Bangalore, IN
1 Department of MBA, Brindavan College, Yelahanka, Bangalore, IN
Source
DHARANA - Bhavan's International Journal of Business, Vol 8, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 3-10Abstract
The issue of Non-Performing Assets (NPA) in the banks is discussed. The magnitude and trend in NPA are studied for the 5 year period 2008-13, using a suitable classification of the banks. A critical evaluation of the reasons and a few recommendations are made which have positive practical implications.Keywords
Asset Quality, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Development Envelopment Analysis, Doubtful Assets, Financial Intermediation, Financial Sector Reforms, Interest Rate Spread, Loan Servicing and Collateral, Loss Assets, Non-Performing Assets, Private Sector Banks, PuReferences
- Bloem, A.M. and Cornelis N. Gorters (2001): The Macroeconomic Statically Treatment of Nonperforming Loans, Discussion Paper, Statistics Department of the International Monetary Fund, December.
- Das, A. and Ghosh, S. (2003): Determinants of Credit Risk, paper presented at the Conference on Money Risk and Investment held at Nottingham Trent University (November).
- Ghosh, S (2005). Does Leverage Influence Bank’s Non-Performing Loan?: Evidences from India.
- Applied Economic Letters, 12 (15): 913-18.
- Ranjana Kumar (2004) “Move towards Risk Based Supervision of Banks: The Role of the Central Banker and the Market Players, Vinimaya, Vol. XXIV, No.1, NIBM Publication, pp 5-12 5. Mohan Rakesh (2004): Finance for Industrial Growth Reserve Bank Of India Bulletin Speech Article (March).
- Vohra, P.S and Dhamu, J. (2012): NPA management-Always a critical issue for banking industry. Journal of banking, information and management. 9(2), 25-32
- Web-Based Surveys:An Emerging Tool
Abstract Views :155 |
PDF Views:79
Authors
Affiliations
1 UGC, Bangalore University, IN
2 Quantitative Methods and Operations, ICFAI Business School, Bangalore, IN
1 UGC, Bangalore University, IN
2 Quantitative Methods and Operations, ICFAI Business School, Bangalore, IN
Source
DHARANA - Bhavan's International Journal of Business, Vol 3, No 2 (2009), Pagination: 51-56Abstract
With increasing web accessibility and popularity, Web-Based-Surveys (WBS) are becoming common and convenient. In spite of the lower cost and greater speed advantages, there are a few concerns with WBS, including sample randomness. This article reviews WBS scenario briefly, mentions advantages and concerns sources of error. The question of noncoverage is addressed in particular and its impact is examined and this study addresses the category of non-respondents. A few seed ideas for addressing the shortcomings of the WBS are given.Keywords
Bias, Dual-Frame Sampling, Internet, Noncoverage, Nonresponse, Randomness, River Sampling, Web-Based Surveys.References
- Bosnjak, MM and Tuten, TL (2001). Classifying response behaviours in web based surveys. Journal of computer mediated communication, Vol. 6(3). http://www.ascusc.org
- Couper MP. (2000): A review of issues and approaches, Public opinion quarterly, Vol. 64(4) pp. 464-481.
- Couper MP, Traugott MW and Lamias, MJ (2001). Web survey design and Administration, Public opinion quarterly, Vol. 65(2), pp. 230-253.
- Dillman, DA (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design Methods, 2nd edition, Wiley , New York.
- Dilman, DA and Bowker, DK (2001). The web questionnaire challenge to Survey methodologists.: http//survey.sesrc.wsu.edu
- Dilman, DA et al (2001). Response rate and measurement Differences in mixed mode surveys using Mail, Telephone, Interactive Voice Response and Internet: http//survey.sesrc.wsu.edu.
- DiSorga, C (2008). River samples: A good catch for researchers? www.knowledgenetworks.com.
- Holly Gunn (2008). Web-based Surveys: Changing the survey Process. First Monday journal on the internet, Vol. 7(12) pp. 1-17.
- Kalton, G (2001) Practical methods for sampling rare and mobile populations: Proceedings of American statistical Association, Section on Survey Research methods.
- Redline, CD and Dilman , DA (1999). The influence of Auxiliary, Symbolic, Numeric and Verbal language on navigational Complience in self administrated questionnaires: http//www.survey.sesrc.wsu.edu.
- Satmetrix, (2001). Investigating validity in Web surveys. http//www.satmetrix.com.
- Solomon, DJ (2001). Conducting Web-based surveys: Practical assessment, Research and Evaluation, Vol. 7(19). http//www.ericae.net.
- Srivenkataramana, T (2007). “Self reporting method in business surveys”, Dharana- Bhavan’s International journal of Business, Vol. 1 (1) pp. 38-40.
- Web Based Surveys:An Analysis of Nonresponse Causes
Abstract Views :170 |
PDF Views:71
Authors
Affiliations
1 Bangalore University, Bangalore, IN
2 Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, IN
3 IBSB, Bangalore, IN
1 Bangalore University, Bangalore, IN
2 Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, IN
3 IBSB, Bangalore, IN
Source
DHARANA - Bhavan's International Journal of Business, Vol 4, No 2 (2010), Pagination: 77-82Abstract
Web based surveys (WBS) are becoming increasingly common due to widening net connectivity. WBS mode has its positive and negative points. Cost and time reductions are on the plus side while the question of randomness of sample, nonresponse and quality of response are on the other. Thus, WBS presents a mixed bag. This paper examines the reasons for nonresponse in WBS. The often quoted reasons are examined using Factor Analysis. It is found that design is a predominant factor.This aspect is further examined by analyzing the effect of positioning of demographic block, using ANOVA. It is noted that this block in the beginning of the questionnaire results in more drop outs as compared to it being later on. Also examined is the impact of sensitivity of questions and its interaction with the positioning of demographic block.Keywords
ANOVA, Demographic Block, Factor Analysis, Noncoverage, Nonresponse, Questionnaire Design, Web Based Surveys.References
- Bikart, B., and Schmittlein, D. (1999). The distribution of survey contact and participation in the United states: constructing a survey-based estimate. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 286-294.
- Bosnjak, M. and Tuten. T. L. (2001). Classifying Response Behaviors in Web-Based Surveys. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6(3).
- Couper, M. P. (2000). Web Surveys. A Review of issues and approaches. Public opinion quarterly, 64, 464-494.
- Couper, M. P., Blair, J. & Triplett T. (1999) A comparision of mail and email for a survey of employees in federal statistical agencies. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 39-56.
- DeLeeuw, E. D. (2005). To mix or not to mix Data collection modes in Surveys. Journal of Official statistics, 21, 233-255.
- Dilman, D. A., Tortora, R. D., Conradt, J., and Bowker, D. (1998). Influence of plain versus Fancy Design on Response Rates for Web Surveys. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, Dallas, TX.
- Grooves and Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in interview surveys, New York, Wiley series in Survey Methodology.
- Knapp, F. and Heidings Felder, M. (2001): “ Drop out analysis: Effects of the survey design”. Pabst science publishers, pp. 221-230.
- MacElroy, B. (2000): “Variables influencing dropout rates in Web based surveys”. Quirks marketing research review, July/August 2000. Paper. http:/www.quirks.com/(November 21, 2001)
- Pratesi, M., Lozar. M. (2004). List-based Web Surveys: Quality, Timeliness, and Nonresponse in the Steps of the Participation Flow, Journal of Official Statistics 20, 451-465.
- Schaefer and Dillman 1998, Development of standard email methodology, public opinion quarterly, 62: 378-97.
- Vera,T., Marcel,D. & Arthur van Soest (2009) Design of Web Questionnaires: The effect of Lay out in Rating scales, Journal of Official Statistics 25, 509-528.
- Self Reporting Method in Business Surveys
Abstract Views :133 |
PDF Views:69
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Statistics, Bangalore University, Bangalore, IN
1 Department of Statistics, Bangalore University, Bangalore, IN
Source
DHARANA - Bhavan's International Journal of Business, Vol 1, No 1 (2007), Pagination: 38-40Abstract
This article reviews the role of self reporting (SR), by survey respondents in business research, given the now widely spread web and online facility with readily accessible panels. In this context, it outlines (a) the effects of response format (b) uses of SR information (c) dropout pattern on the web, together with affecting factors and (d) dual frame sampling for rare groups. Relevant empirical evidences, wherever necessary, are cited.Keywords
Dual Frame Sampling, Self Reporting, Telephone Cluster Sampling, Web Based Design.References
- Blair E. and Blari, J (2006), Dual Frame web-telephone sampling for rare groups. Journal of official statistics, 22(2), 211-220.
- Buse Meyer J. R. and Townsend, J. T. (1993). A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological review, 100, 432-459.
- Galesic M (2006). Dropouts on Web: Effects of interest and burden experienced during an online survey, Journal of official statistics 22(2), 313-328.
- Kalton G (2001). Practical methods for sampling rare and mobile populations. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, section on Survey Research Methods, August.
- Lee E., Hu, M. Y. and Toh, R. S. (2000). Are consumer survey results distorted? Systematic Impact of Behavioural Frequency and Duration on Survey Response Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 125-133.
- Thomas R. K., Behke,S., Smith R. and Lafond, R. (2003). It's only incidental: Effects of Response Format in determining incidence. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN.
- Thomas R. K. and Klein, J. D. (2006). Journal of Official Statistics 22(2), 221-244.
- Application of Statistical Sampling to Audit and Control
Abstract Views :269 |
PDF Views:97
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Statistics, Bangalore University, Bangalore, IN
1 Department of Statistics, Bangalore University, Bangalore, IN
Source
DHARANA - Bhavan's International Journal of Business, Vol 12, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 14-19Abstract
The traditional literature applying statistical sampling to auditing sometimes overlooks the special structure of audit populations. Much of the literature is based on techniques developed for sample surveys. Of late there is an increasing awareness to take note of the unique environment in which audit sampling takes place and to incorporate all available auxiliary information to improve the precision of estimators. The present paper begins with a brief historical review and then focuses on the special nature of audit populations. This is followed by the description of a class of auxiliary information estimators and the occasional problem caused by situations of low frequency of errors but with large magnitudes. Next, monetary unit sampling is reviewed and key unit sampling is proposed as an alternative when the former may not apply. An outline of a Bayesian formulation to use prior information is provided. Finally, guidelines are provided for a choice of procedure enumerating the major factors to be considered.Keywords
Audit and Control, Key Unit Sampling, Monetary Unit Sampling.References
- • Anderson, R and Teitlebaum, A.D (1973). Dollar-Unit Sampling C.A.Magazine, 102(4), 30-39.
- • Carman, L.A. (1933). The Efficacy of Tests, American Accountant, 18, 360-66.
- • Cos, D.R. and Snell, E.J. (1979). On Sampling and the Estimation of Rare Errors. Biometrika, 66, 125-32.
- • Felix, W.I and Grimlund, R.A (1984). Dollar Unit Sampling for Accounts Receivable and Inventory.
- Accounting Review, 59, 218-41.
- • Fienberg, S.,Neter, J and Leitch, R.A (1977). Estimating the Total over – statement Error in Accounting Populations. Journal of American Statistical Association, 72, 295-302.
- • Kaplan, R.S (1973), Statistical Sampling in Auditing with Auxiliary Information Estimators. Journal of Accounting Research, 11(2), 238-58.
- • Loebbecke, J.K and Neter, J (1975). Considerations in choosing Statistical Sampling procedures in Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 3897.
- • Moors, J J A and Janssens, MJBT (1989). Exact distributions of Bayesian Cox-Snell Bounds in Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 135-44.
- • Neter.J (1949). An Investigation of the usefulness of Statistical Sampling Methods in Auditing. Journal of Accountancy, 87, 390-98.
- A Cuboid Model for Coverage Processes
Abstract Views :267 |
PDF Views:98
Authors
Affiliations
1 Manipal University, IN
2 Department of Statistics, Bangalore University, IN
3 R. V. Institute of Management, Bengaluru, IN
4 M. P. Birla Institute of Management, IN
1 Manipal University, IN
2 Department of Statistics, Bangalore University, IN
3 R. V. Institute of Management, Bengaluru, IN
4 M. P. Birla Institute of Management, IN
Source
DHARANA - Bhavan's International Journal of Business, Vol 11, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 5-12Abstract
This paper introduces the concept of a coverage process. It proposes and analyses a cuboid model for coverage processes seeking multi-dimensional expansion. The WHO view of Universal Healthcare is used as a seed to first develop a cube model. The conditions for optimum coverage are derived. The model is then generalized into a cuboid and some of its mathematical properties are investigated. The model has applications in areas like universal insurance, multiple financial inclusion campaign, immunization drives and service quality. This model is forerunner for intrinsic link between organization’s objectives with that of service quality delivery for effective relationship between clients and the organization.Keywords
Coverage Rate, Cuboid Model, Geometric Mean, Impact factor, Linear, Geometric and Continuous Changes, Service Quality, Total Service Quality (TSQ) and Universal Healthcare.References
- http://www.yeshasvini.kar.nic.in/ 1. - retrieved on 30-Nov-14 at 10.34 PM
- World Health Atlas 2011 of WHO.